FocalMathSupport Us

OM System OM-1 Mark II

Real Sensor Data

Brand
OM System
Sensor Format
Micro Four Thirds
Resolution
20.4 MP
Pixel Pitch
3.32 microns
Circle of Confusion
0.0144 mm
Crop Factor
2.00x
Announced
2024

Released in 2024, the OM-1 Mark II carries forward the same 20.4-megapixel stacked Micro Four Thirds sensor as the original OM-1, with OM System's engineering focus this generation directed toward autofocus refinement, buffer depth and computational photography features rather than a resolution increase — a deliberate choice reflecting where the format's real limits genuinely sit.

OM System OM-1 Mark II sensor specs

Sensor
Micro Four Thirds
Resolution
20.4 MP
Pixel dimensions
5,215 × 3,912 px
Aspect ratio
4:3
Pixel pitch
3.32 µm
Crop factor
2.00x
Circle of confusion
0.0144 mm

Micro Four Thirds sensor · DoF & Hyperfocal Calculator · Astro 500/NPF Calculator

Why the Sensor Stayed the Same

Rather than chasing higher megapixel counts each generation, OM System kept the OM-1's proven stacked sensor unchanged and concentrated improvements on processing speed, autofocus subject detection and in-camera computational modes like high-resolution handheld shooting and live graduated-ND simulation — features that extend what the sensor can do rather than replacing it outright, a strategy that mirrors how several other manufacturers have approached mature sensor generations.

The stacked-sensor readout speed and rolling-shutter advantage that made the original OM-1 a genuine turning point for the format carries over here unchanged, since the Mark II inherits the identical chip.

Computational Modes Built Around the Sensor's Limits

OM System leans heavily on in-camera computational photography to work around Micro Four Thirds's smaller sensor size — handheld high-resolution shooting combines multiple frames into a genuinely higher-resolution composite than the native 20.4 megapixels, and live ND simulation blends multiple exposures for a long-exposure look without a physical filter. These features don't change the sensor's underlying pixel pitch or circle of confusion for the calculators on this site, but they're a real, practical part of how the OM-1 Mark II extends what its base sensor resolution can produce in specific shooting situations.

Where the OM-1 Mark II Fits

As OM System's flagship, the OM-1 Mark II sits above the more compact, travel-focused OM-5 and the earlier Olympus-branded E-M1 line, aimed specifically at wildlife, sports and outdoor photographers who want the format's genuine size, weight and telephoto-reach advantages alongside professional-grade autofocus and weather sealing.

Live Composite: A Genuinely Distinctive Long-Exposure Tool

OM System's Live Composite mode, inherited from earlier Olympus bodies, builds a star-trail or light-trail image in real time by continuously blending only the brighter new light from each successive frame into a single accumulating exposure, displayed live on the rear screen as it forms — a genuinely distinctive way to preview a multi-minute exposure's outcome as it develops rather than waiting until the shutter finally closes, unlike the standard long-exposure workflow on most other camera systems.

What Actually Changed in the Body Itself

The IP53 weather sealing rating that made the original OM-1 a credible outdoor tool from launch carries straight through to the Mark II unchanged — this generation's real engineering attention went into autofocus subject detection, buffer depth and computational shooting modes, as covered above, not the sealing standard itself.

OM System also improved the OM-1 Mark II's buffer depth substantially over the original OM-1, letting it sustain longer high-speed bursts before the camera needed to pause and clear memory.

See these numbers used live in the DoF & Hyperfocal Calculator by selecting the Micro Four Thirds sensor format.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's actually different between the OM-1 and the OM-1 Mark II?

The sensor itself is unchanged — same 20.4-megapixel stacked chip as the original OM-1, so this page's depth-of-field and astro figures apply equally to both. OM System spent this generation's engineering budget on autofocus subject detection and buffer depth instead of a new imaging chip.

Why do wildlife photographers specifically choose Micro Four Thirds despite its smaller sensor?

The format's roughly 2x crop factor gives genuine, calculable extra telephoto reach from a given real focal length, letting wildlife and birding photographers use meaningfully smaller and lighter lenses to reach the same field of view a much larger, heavier full-frame telephoto lens would need.

Does the OM-1 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

Yes, and OM System's in-body stabilization ratings are among the strongest in the industry, a real practical benefit for handheld telephoto and macro work where the format's smaller sensor and lenses already make a genuinely portable setup even more manageable.